The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$thread_modes - Line: 46 - File: showthread.php(1621) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.27 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1621) : eval()'d code 46 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1621 eval




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why Wasn't King David Allowed to Build the Temple?
#1
When reading the text, it seems as if the reason King David wasn't allowed to build the Temple was because he had "blood on his hands" as he said himself.

But was that really the reason, or does the text seem to state another reason? Let's look deeper into the verses to see if we can find out!

So there was a desire from King David to build the Temple as he expressed to the prophet Nathan saying the Lord had given him rest from all his surrounding enemies. And Nathan responded - "All that is in your heart, go do, for the Lord is with you"

But that very night G-d appeared to Nathan and informed him he had erred. Nathan told King David that G-d would establish a dynasty for him, but it would be his son who would build the Temple. No mention was given of King David being barred from building it due to his having shed blood.

So what is the reason then?

If we look at Deuteronomy 12:9-11, Moses tells the Jewish people -

9 - For you have not yet come to the resting place or to the inheritance, which the Lord, your God, is giving you. 10 -And you shall cross the Jordan and settle in the land the Lord, your God, is giving you as an inheritance, and He will give you rest from all your enemies surrounding you, and you will dwell securely. 11 -And it will be, that the place the Lord, your God, will choose in which to establish His Name there you shall bring all that I am commanding you: Your burnt offerings, and your sacrifices, your tithes, and the separation by your hand, and the choice of vows which you will vow to the Lord.

King David's initial proposal noted that he had vanquished the enemies which he thought to be sufficient. But if you look closely at the verse in Deuteronomy, it also includes "and you will dwell securely."

We see in I Kings 5:5  -

And Judah and Israel dwelt safely, every man under his vine and under his fig-tree, from Dan even to Beer-sheba, all the days of Solomon.

There is more but I'm trying (yes, believe it or not!) to keep it short and readable.

So this may be the real reason King David was not allowed to build the Temple. Because all that was written in Deuteronomy was not yet fulfilled. There had to be both rest from the enemies and dwelling in safety.

Portions copied from article by Rabbi Dr. Ari Z. Zivotofsky in the Jewish Action magazine.
Reply
#2
Funny that David couldn't keep his hands off the temple. No, he didn't build it, but he made everything else, even the iron for the nails and I'm sure he enjoyed it. I personally believe that G‑d told him about the blood on his hands (1.Chronicles 22).

Interesting thing about peace and security. Would Solomon have continued David's fight if he had wanted to take all of the promised land, and would David's grandson have built the temple then?
Reply
#3
You are correct Blue Bird good observation!

King David does say that in I Chronicles 22:8 and even again in I Chronicles 28:3!

So, maybe there was more than one reason why he was not aloud to build the Temple.

I Chronicles 22:9 does say with Solomon (whose name means peaceful) there will be peace and quiet in Israel in his time.
Reply
#4
Shalom, Solomon. I think peace was important. You don't want to move such big stones and wooden beams when your enemy is just around the corner.
Reply
#5
About the Temple's history..see the following link.....and related links......
https://www.chabad.org/parshah/article_c...-Slope.htm
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_c...le-Yet.htm
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)