Judaism Hosea 6:2

[George]

Hosea 6:2

He will revive us from the two days, on the third day He will set us up, and we will live before Him.

Rashi's comments:

He will revive us from the two days: He will strengthen us from the two retributions which have passed over us from the two sanctuaries that were destroyed.

on the third day: With the construction of the third Temple, He will set us up. 

from the two days: From the two times that have passed over us.

on the third day: In the third time.

I don't understand Rashi's comments.

What does Judaism teach about this verse?

Thank you.

Moderator Note

I removed the super large font settings from your post and applied a thread prefix. Be aware that large fonts give the impression of shouting. If you need to view fonts larger, use the relative font size button on your browser.

[Jason]

You should have enough acquaintance with Judaism at this point to know that a commentary does not speak for all Jewish voices – even one as revered as Rashi’s.

Rash is giving a non-literal sense to the words, taking them to refer to the three Temples in Jerusalem: two that have been destroyed and one that is yet to come. I don’t think the commentary is absurd. The verse certainly can be interpreted in this way.

Have you read the Ramban’s commentary on Exodus 3 about YHWH going into exile with his people? This is similar.

[George]

You should have enough acquaintance with Judaism at this point to know that a commentary does not speak for all Jewish voices – even one as revered as Rashi’s.

Rash is giving a non-literal sense to the words, taking them to refer to the three Temples in Jerusalem: two that have been destroyed and one that is yet to come. I don’t think the commentary is absurd. The verse certainly can be interpreted in this way.

Have you read the Ramban’s commentary on Exodus 3 about YHWH going into exile with his people? This is similar.

No, I haven't read it.

I just wanted to make sure Hosea 6:2 was not about the "general resurrection" of the dead.

[George]

You should have enough acquaintance with Judaism at this point to know that a commentary does not speak for all Jewish voices – even one as revered as Rashi’s.

Rash is giving a non-literal sense to the words, taking them to refer to the three Temples in Jerusalem: two that have been destroyed and one that is yet to come. I don’t think the commentary is absurd. The verse certainly can be interpreted in this way.

Have you read the Ramban’s commentary on Exodus 3 about YHWH going into exile with his people? This is similar.

No, I have not read Ramban's commentary on Exodus 3.  I'll look for it.