08-14-2020, 08:46 PM
So, your doctrine is superior because it rejects the New Testament?
My thinking:
1. The New Testament says again and again and again that Jesus died for the sin of the world.
2. By rejecting the idea that Jesus died for sins, you are rejecting a principle teaching of the New Testament.
3. Rejecting the New Testament undermines the entire teaching about Jesus and who he was and what he did.
4. If you undermine the New Testament, there is no other basis on which to make claims about Jesus.
You cannot know if Jesus existed without the New Testament. You cannot know what Jesus said without the New Testament. You cannot know where Jesus went or who he went there with without the New Testament.
If you reject the New Testament, you are logically obligated to reject everything you know about Jesus and throw that garbage teaching into the bin. You're so close to the truth, yet so far away by holding on to an entire mythology developed around a teacher who most likely never even existed.
My thinking:
1. The New Testament says again and again and again that Jesus died for the sin of the world.
2. By rejecting the idea that Jesus died for sins, you are rejecting a principle teaching of the New Testament.
3. Rejecting the New Testament undermines the entire teaching about Jesus and who he was and what he did.
4. If you undermine the New Testament, there is no other basis on which to make claims about Jesus.
You cannot know if Jesus existed without the New Testament. You cannot know what Jesus said without the New Testament. You cannot know where Jesus went or who he went there with without the New Testament.
If you reject the New Testament, you are logically obligated to reject everything you know about Jesus and throw that garbage teaching into the bin. You're so close to the truth, yet so far away by holding on to an entire mythology developed around a teacher who most likely never even existed.