Offended as a logical person.

[searchinmyroots]

My answer is short and to the point -

By reading and understanding what is written in the Hebrew bible.

Well, that is my point.  If the priests could not partake of the sacrifice if it's blood was brought into the sanctuary (as in day of Atonement) but had to to burn it outside the camp isn't it logical that Yeshua is Messiah since he suffered outside the camp (city) and a follower of him CAN partake of this sacrifice, in-other-words, get the atonement inside of themselves?

What is logical in my point of view is what the Hebrew bible alludes to as a coming messiah, not what "may seem logical".

Do you think it was just an animal sacrifice that brought atonement?

Have you read what other parts of the Hebrew bible say in reference to that?

Was Jesus burned outside the camp?

He suffered outside the gate of Jerusalem, outside the temple.  He was burnt in Hell (as King David prophesied).  The passover was to be roasted symbolizing the same. And not a bone was broken of him (or the lamb) as per Moses' instructions.  To me this is a logical connection.  I can give chapter and verse for everything if you need me to.  What else brought atonement (besides the scapegoat)?  As for what other parts of the Hebrew bible say in reference to the priests not being allowed to eat if blood brought into sanctuary I can connect to it the vow and thank offerings that could be eaten (so as to get atonement that the priests could not get because they were not allowed to eat of it).

So it looks like you are just going to throw things at us that really don't apply and I don't really want to address everything that has already been addressed for thousands of years.

Let's get to the real point.

What does the Hebrew bible say about what would seem to be a coming messiah?

How will we know he has arrived?

No types and shadows please.