How to Immediately end the alleged-Illegality of Israeli "settlements":
International Media articles and TV News reports refer to:
"Israeli settlements illegal under international law":
While this is bias in favor of the "Palestinian" Arabs, it is not the typical Media bias against Israel that gives the news only from the "Palestinian" Arab side, because it can claim it is based in "international law", meaning here United Nations biased-resolutions and policies against Israel:
In the case of Israel, what then does "international law" from the U.N. mean?:
It refers to United Nations resolutions, policies (copied by the European Union and other countries such as the United Kingdom), and the consequential legal decisions of courts linked to the U.N., that create a chain of law falsely accusing the Jewish people of stealing their own ancestral-homeland of Israel and consequentially also therefore of building "illegal settlements".
The historical circumstances in which such Media articles and News reports are based, refer to Israel having recovered in 1967 its ancestral-lands of "Judah and Samaria" (since known wrongly as "West Bank, the"), from the Jordanian illegal-occupiers.
The following is how the U.N. falsehood against Israel works:
> Falsely regarding Israel/the Jewish people as illegally-occupying "Judah and Samaria" ("West Bank, the");
> Then, based on that consequently, Israeli homes and villages (referred to in the Media (and strangely also in Israel) erroneously as "settlements"), within "Judah and Samaria" ("West Bank") become: "illegal in International law";
> Then, consequential U.N. Court decisions based in those biased U.N. policies.
How does the U.N. bias against Israel work?:
The “Palestinian” Arabs start-off in U.N. votes by enjoying a block-vote in their favor of up to 56 Arab and additional Islamic-aligned countries (e.g. U.N. member states that are also members of the “Organization of Islamic Cooperation” and follow its policies when voting in the U.N.), and influence of Arab oil money with consequential trading power; compared to Israel’s one vote.
Security Council resolutions passed against Israel are typically during the tenure of U.S. Democratic Party Presidents who decide not to use their veto to protect Israel from unjust resolutions.
Accepted international constitutional law is that Laws must not be passed that are intrinsically-unjust that persecute a minority, as are the U.N. decisions against Israel, which falsely-validate the unverifiable-claims of the “Palestinian” Arabs.
An example of unjust-laws were the Nuremberg Laws of Nazi Germany which persecuted the Jews.
Why are U.N. policies claiming Israel illegally-occupies any part of its ancestral-homeland, wrong?:
Israel is Re-established within the Jewish ancestral-homeland. Internationally-recognized history shows that the last indigenous sovereign state in the land of Israel (Roman-imposed name “Palestine”), prior to the RE-establishment of Israel in 1948, was the post-Biblical Jewish Hasmonean Kingdom. It included the: “West Bank”, Gaza, and Golan Heights. Capital (what is now “EAST”) Jerusalem / “Old City”; between 110 BCE / 754 BH and 63 BCE / 706 BH - Map:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c...ingdom.jpg
Such U.N. policies are illegal, being in conflict with the international treaty signed by the Israelis and “Palestinian” Arabs - the Oslo Accords which also constitute international law.
There has never been any indigenous “Palestine” / Arab sovereign state in the land of Israel upon which the “Palestinian” Arabs could base any claim to any part of Israel.
The “Palestinian Arabs” dropped the name “Arab” so you should not understand they mostly originate from Foreign-Arab-Migrant-Workers who came to the land of Israel just prior to, and during, the British Mandate - See “Arab Immigration to Historic Palestine: A Survey”, by Richard Mather:
https://richardmatherblog.wordpress.com/2015/05/
Since the "Palestinian" Arabs arrived in the land in recent history, the correct terms to use regarding Israeli home-building in the "West Bank" should be as follows:
> “Israelis” (NOT Israeli “settlers”) (being either: Jews whose ancestors have unbroken-presence in their ancestral-homeland of Israel, or Jewish returnee-exiles).
> “Israeli-homes” / "Israeli village” (NOT Israeli “settlement(s)”). (When referring to more than one abode.)
Jews “Re-settling” their ancestral-homeland are therefore “Returnees”.
Israeli “settlers” are either:
> Jews whose ancestors have unbroken-presence in their ancestral-homeland of Israel.
> Jewish-exiles returned to their ancestral-homeland of Israel, who have Judah heritage.
(The clue is in the name: “Jew”=citizen of Judah - Judaism is both an ethnicity as well as a religion.)
Thus:
> “Palestinian-Arab settlers” (NOT “Palestinian villagers”).
> “Palestinian-Arab settlement” (NOT “Palestinian village”) (when referring to more than one abode.)
84 out of 100 of the highest incidence Palestinian surnames (Palestine region in 2004), had highest incidence outside that region:
My extract source document:
“Country Origin of Palestinian Arab Surnames upd.pdf” - information source “forebears.io”:
https://www.mediafire.com/file/9d115bv6w...d.pdf/file
Therefore when considering biased Media articles and News reports against Israel, it is necessary to draw a distinction between simple-Media bias (which can be defined as telling the news only from one side), from the bias that sources from the U.N. unjust-resolutions against Israel (aka "international law") which require rebuttal.
I have discussed in more detail the falsehood of an alleged Israeli "illegal occupation" here:
"Do the Jews / Israel ‘illegally-occupy’ their ancestral-homeland and/or “Palestine”?":
https://www.thehebrewcafe.com/forum/show...hp?tid=780
Also, I have discussed in more detail the falsehood of Israeli "illegal settlements", here:
"Why are Israeli Homes (“Settlements”) on the “West Bank” allegedly “Illegal”?":
https://www.thehebrewcafe.com/forum/show...hp?tid=784
How to immediately end the alleged Israeli Illegal-occupation of its ancestral-land, and also the alleged "illegal" status of Israeli home and village building (alleged "illegal"-"settlements") there:
The falsehood purporting an Israeli illegal-occupation of any part the Jewish ancestral-homeland, comes from the anti-Semitic policies of the United Nations, and which therefore the U.N. should repeal forthwith.
An example of a different U.N. anti-Semitic policy subsequently repealed, was the U.N.'s falsehood that Zionism (Jewish nationalism) was form of racism:
https://www.nytimes.com/1991/12/17/world...acism.html
The U.N. bias against Israel and the Jewish people constitutes an attempt to make anti-Semitism normal.
Once the U.N. have repealed their illegal and illogical falsehood purporting an Israeli illegal-occupation, the U.N. should offer an apology to the Jewish people for the 56 years of the U.N.'s suffocating anti-Semitic trumped-up charge.
[Part of: "Uncle Bob's Handy-Guide to the Palestinian surreal-narrative".
View more, by doing (if any error - try first logging-in):
Click on my username > Within the 'Robert's Forum Info' box, under 'Total Threads:', click: "Find All Threads".]
International Media articles and TV News reports refer to:
"Israeli settlements illegal under international law":
While this is bias in favor of the "Palestinian" Arabs, it is not the typical Media bias against Israel that gives the news only from the "Palestinian" Arab side, because it can claim it is based in "international law", meaning here United Nations biased-resolutions and policies against Israel:
In the case of Israel, what then does "international law" from the U.N. mean?:
It refers to United Nations resolutions, policies (copied by the European Union and other countries such as the United Kingdom), and the consequential legal decisions of courts linked to the U.N., that create a chain of law falsely accusing the Jewish people of stealing their own ancestral-homeland of Israel and consequentially also therefore of building "illegal settlements".
The historical circumstances in which such Media articles and News reports are based, refer to Israel having recovered in 1967 its ancestral-lands of "Judah and Samaria" (since known wrongly as "West Bank, the"), from the Jordanian illegal-occupiers.
The following is how the U.N. falsehood against Israel works:
> Falsely regarding Israel/the Jewish people as illegally-occupying "Judah and Samaria" ("West Bank, the");
> Then, based on that consequently, Israeli homes and villages (referred to in the Media (and strangely also in Israel) erroneously as "settlements"), within "Judah and Samaria" ("West Bank") become: "illegal in International law";
> Then, consequential U.N. Court decisions based in those biased U.N. policies.
How does the U.N. bias against Israel work?:
The “Palestinian” Arabs start-off in U.N. votes by enjoying a block-vote in their favor of up to 56 Arab and additional Islamic-aligned countries (e.g. U.N. member states that are also members of the “Organization of Islamic Cooperation” and follow its policies when voting in the U.N.), and influence of Arab oil money with consequential trading power; compared to Israel’s one vote.
Security Council resolutions passed against Israel are typically during the tenure of U.S. Democratic Party Presidents who decide not to use their veto to protect Israel from unjust resolutions.
Accepted international constitutional law is that Laws must not be passed that are intrinsically-unjust that persecute a minority, as are the U.N. decisions against Israel, which falsely-validate the unverifiable-claims of the “Palestinian” Arabs.
An example of unjust-laws were the Nuremberg Laws of Nazi Germany which persecuted the Jews.
Why are U.N. policies claiming Israel illegally-occupies any part of its ancestral-homeland, wrong?:
Israel is Re-established within the Jewish ancestral-homeland. Internationally-recognized history shows that the last indigenous sovereign state in the land of Israel (Roman-imposed name “Palestine”), prior to the RE-establishment of Israel in 1948, was the post-Biblical Jewish Hasmonean Kingdom. It included the: “West Bank”, Gaza, and Golan Heights. Capital (what is now “EAST”) Jerusalem / “Old City”; between 110 BCE / 754 BH and 63 BCE / 706 BH - Map:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c...ingdom.jpg
Such U.N. policies are illegal, being in conflict with the international treaty signed by the Israelis and “Palestinian” Arabs - the Oslo Accords which also constitute international law.
There has never been any indigenous “Palestine” / Arab sovereign state in the land of Israel upon which the “Palestinian” Arabs could base any claim to any part of Israel.
The “Palestinian Arabs” dropped the name “Arab” so you should not understand they mostly originate from Foreign-Arab-Migrant-Workers who came to the land of Israel just prior to, and during, the British Mandate - See “Arab Immigration to Historic Palestine: A Survey”, by Richard Mather:
https://richardmatherblog.wordpress.com/2015/05/
Since the "Palestinian" Arabs arrived in the land in recent history, the correct terms to use regarding Israeli home-building in the "West Bank" should be as follows:
> “Israelis” (NOT Israeli “settlers”) (being either: Jews whose ancestors have unbroken-presence in their ancestral-homeland of Israel, or Jewish returnee-exiles).
> “Israeli-homes” / "Israeli village” (NOT Israeli “settlement(s)”). (When referring to more than one abode.)
Jews “Re-settling” their ancestral-homeland are therefore “Returnees”.
Israeli “settlers” are either:
> Jews whose ancestors have unbroken-presence in their ancestral-homeland of Israel.
> Jewish-exiles returned to their ancestral-homeland of Israel, who have Judah heritage.
(The clue is in the name: “Jew”=citizen of Judah - Judaism is both an ethnicity as well as a religion.)
Thus:
> “Palestinian-Arab settlers” (NOT “Palestinian villagers”).
> “Palestinian-Arab settlement” (NOT “Palestinian village”) (when referring to more than one abode.)
84 out of 100 of the highest incidence Palestinian surnames (Palestine region in 2004), had highest incidence outside that region:
My extract source document:
“Country Origin of Palestinian Arab Surnames upd.pdf” - information source “forebears.io”:
https://www.mediafire.com/file/9d115bv6w...d.pdf/file
Therefore when considering biased Media articles and News reports against Israel, it is necessary to draw a distinction between simple-Media bias (which can be defined as telling the news only from one side), from the bias that sources from the U.N. unjust-resolutions against Israel (aka "international law") which require rebuttal.
I have discussed in more detail the falsehood of an alleged Israeli "illegal occupation" here:
"Do the Jews / Israel ‘illegally-occupy’ their ancestral-homeland and/or “Palestine”?":
https://www.thehebrewcafe.com/forum/show...hp?tid=780
Also, I have discussed in more detail the falsehood of Israeli "illegal settlements", here:
"Why are Israeli Homes (“Settlements”) on the “West Bank” allegedly “Illegal”?":
https://www.thehebrewcafe.com/forum/show...hp?tid=784
How to immediately end the alleged Israeli Illegal-occupation of its ancestral-land, and also the alleged "illegal" status of Israeli home and village building (alleged "illegal"-"settlements") there:
The falsehood purporting an Israeli illegal-occupation of any part the Jewish ancestral-homeland, comes from the anti-Semitic policies of the United Nations, and which therefore the U.N. should repeal forthwith.
An example of a different U.N. anti-Semitic policy subsequently repealed, was the U.N.'s falsehood that Zionism (Jewish nationalism) was form of racism:
https://www.nytimes.com/1991/12/17/world...acism.html
The U.N. bias against Israel and the Jewish people constitutes an attempt to make anti-Semitism normal.
Once the U.N. have repealed their illegal and illogical falsehood purporting an Israeli illegal-occupation, the U.N. should offer an apology to the Jewish people for the 56 years of the U.N.'s suffocating anti-Semitic trumped-up charge.
[Part of: "Uncle Bob's Handy-Guide to the Palestinian surreal-narrative".
View more, by doing (if any error - try first logging-in):
Click on my username > Within the 'Robert's Forum Info' box, under 'Total Threads:', click: "Find All Threads".]