10-30-2021, 09:20 PM
(10-30-2021, 07:08 PM)Alan_Boskov Wrote: Of course. But if I needed to refrain from sending a message, because of doubting the source on one or more points, I need not send any messages whatsoever.
The claim has been around long enough for Mr. Fauci to sue the sources for laible, if these claims happen to be unsubstantiated. His refusal in judicially challenging these claims does nothing to prove these accusations to be a product of either a fictitious or a distorted origin.
In my opinion, it is certainly better to not spread false information than to spread information that is of doubtful veracity with no substantiation whatsoever. Don't you want to be responsible for promoting reliable sources who substantiate their claims? Also, it doesn't seem like you understand the legal definition of libel. Neither nor your source committed libel against Dr Fauci. At worst it seems that you're simply spreading false and unsubstantiated claims about a study said to be approved by the NIH. That Fauci has not sued you or your source for something they did not do, does nothing whatsoever substantiate your claims.