10-31-2021, 12:57 PM
Alan, don't you see the illogic of your position?
On the one hand, you provide reasons why Dr. Fauci should not sue for libel:
On the other hand, you want to use the fact that he has not sued anyone for libel as an argument for your allegations being true:
But the more fundamental illogic of your position is that, as I've already said, your allegations are not libel against him. Let that sink in for a moment. At worst it seems that you're simply spreading false and unsubstantiated claims about a study said to be approved by the NIH. That is not libel against Fauci. It's just false and unsubstantiated claims about a study said to be approved by the NIH.
On the one hand, you provide reasons why Dr. Fauci should not sue for libel:
Quote:First of all, if Fauci tries to sue me for alleging, that would be bad business, as long as there are bigger fishes to fry.
On the other hand, you want to use the fact that he has not sued anyone for libel as an argument for your allegations being true:
Quote:If allegations against him were not true, his judicial inaction is preventing him from taking a lucrative opportunity in collecting damages from these sources. His inaction is also indicative of the allegation's plausibility.
But the more fundamental illogic of your position is that, as I've already said, your allegations are not libel against him. Let that sink in for a moment. At worst it seems that you're simply spreading false and unsubstantiated claims about a study said to be approved by the NIH. That is not libel against Fauci. It's just false and unsubstantiated claims about a study said to be approved by the NIH.