Why does Luke add a verse that is not there?

[searchinmyroots]

Well, I thought about this a little more and want to make these comments -

I don't think what is written is open for reprove or correction. I think it is open for interpretation which is something completely different.

Also, what Paul wrote doesn't take away from the fact that words were added to what the Christian bible says is written on the scroll when they clearly are not there.

That's not reproving or correcting, that is adding.

The way I see it, if Paul wants to use those words to correct what is written as he says, then it should read something like -

It is written .................................. and what is left out is........................

or, what should also be written is................................

Again, just stating my opinion which is just that.