The proposed changes to Israel's Supreme Court by the current Israeli government appear to be well known. However, I would like to know whether the Israeli government has communicated their reasons for their proposed changes about the Israeli Supreme Court.
If they have, then what are they?
It seems rather unlikely the Israeli government would seek to proceed with their proposed legislation about the Israeli Supreme Court, without first letting the Israeli citizen know what are the Israeli government's concerns with the Supreme Court, concerns such that would arguably justify the proposed changes.
I have been unable to find the Israeli government's reasoning on this, on the Internet.
The protests against the proposed changes indicate a good knowledge of what those changes are, so is the Israeli government's reasoning for the proposed changes either:
Absent,
or
Not properly communicated?
In the absence of communication of the Israeli government's concerns arguably-justifying their proposed changes, this would inevitably lead the Israeli citizen to suspect an undemocratic "power grab" by the executive and legislature, over the judiciary.
I can only assume there must be something about the Supreme Court's track-record of decision making, about which the current Israeli government has concern.
However, again I have been unable to find any information on the Internet regarding the Israeli Supreme Court's track-record of decision making.
I do however recall, that in the case of Jewish landowners seeking the return of their land from Palestinian Arabs at Sheikh Jarrah, the judges offered a license to the Palestinian Arabs to remain if they would recognize the ownership of the Jewish landowners (which of course the Palestinian Arabs refused); thus indicating (if my understanding of those circumstances is correct), that the judges gave an impression they might be more interested in finding a way to allow the Palestinian Arabs to remain, than in awarding vacant possession to the Jewish landowners.
Another way to put this issue might be:
The changes to the Israeli Supreme Court proposed by the Israeli government, have produced significant protest in Israel, yet I have been unable to find on the Internet what are the Israeli Governments' s concerns with the Supreme Court, that have led them to propose the changes. For example, is there (I do not have such information) any track-record of Israeli Supreme Court decisions that comply with the political-bias in the United Nations against Israel which wrongly-considers the Jewish people to be invaders, thieves, and illegal-occupiers of their own ancestral-homeland of Israel. Were that to be the case, then it would be understandable that some or all the proposed changes might be needed, so as to cause the Israeli Supreme Court to comply with the Jewish people's rightful self-determination within their Jewish homeland - Israel and which includes the whole of Jerusalem and the "West Bank" (Judah and Samaria) - Look up the Jewish post-Biblical Hasmonean Kingdom).
2 April 2023.
If they have, then what are they?
It seems rather unlikely the Israeli government would seek to proceed with their proposed legislation about the Israeli Supreme Court, without first letting the Israeli citizen know what are the Israeli government's concerns with the Supreme Court, concerns such that would arguably justify the proposed changes.
I have been unable to find the Israeli government's reasoning on this, on the Internet.
The protests against the proposed changes indicate a good knowledge of what those changes are, so is the Israeli government's reasoning for the proposed changes either:
Absent,
or
Not properly communicated?
In the absence of communication of the Israeli government's concerns arguably-justifying their proposed changes, this would inevitably lead the Israeli citizen to suspect an undemocratic "power grab" by the executive and legislature, over the judiciary.
I can only assume there must be something about the Supreme Court's track-record of decision making, about which the current Israeli government has concern.
However, again I have been unable to find any information on the Internet regarding the Israeli Supreme Court's track-record of decision making.
I do however recall, that in the case of Jewish landowners seeking the return of their land from Palestinian Arabs at Sheikh Jarrah, the judges offered a license to the Palestinian Arabs to remain if they would recognize the ownership of the Jewish landowners (which of course the Palestinian Arabs refused); thus indicating (if my understanding of those circumstances is correct), that the judges gave an impression they might be more interested in finding a way to allow the Palestinian Arabs to remain, than in awarding vacant possession to the Jewish landowners.
Another way to put this issue might be:
The changes to the Israeli Supreme Court proposed by the Israeli government, have produced significant protest in Israel, yet I have been unable to find on the Internet what are the Israeli Governments' s concerns with the Supreme Court, that have led them to propose the changes. For example, is there (I do not have such information) any track-record of Israeli Supreme Court decisions that comply with the political-bias in the United Nations against Israel which wrongly-considers the Jewish people to be invaders, thieves, and illegal-occupiers of their own ancestral-homeland of Israel. Were that to be the case, then it would be understandable that some or all the proposed changes might be needed, so as to cause the Israeli Supreme Court to comply with the Jewish people's rightful self-determination within their Jewish homeland - Israel and which includes the whole of Jerusalem and the "West Bank" (Judah and Samaria) - Look up the Jewish post-Biblical Hasmonean Kingdom).
2 April 2023.