04-12-2025, 01:09 PM
Hello everyone,
I realize that this is a contentious topic, and I anticipate opposition—but request you to remain open-minded and to read this.
We have learned for decades now that 6 million Jews were systematically killed by the Nazis by means of almost exclusively gas chambers in death camps like Auschwitz and Treblinka. Not just is this account accepted but mandated by law in many countries, dissent being the equivalent of hate.
But I have ended up raising serious questions about a lot of details in this account.
Not out of disrespect—because history needs to be open for questioning. And when some part of history is off-limits to discussion, that's when we need to question it the most.
Ask yourself:
- Where is Hitler's explicit, clear command?
- Why are there so many of the supposed gas chambers post-World War II rebuilds?
- Why are no Red Cross accounts of the time written that include the term "genocide"?
- Why are some "survivor" accounts inconsistent, or subsequently proved to be untrue?
- Why is the number "6 million" being published in newspapers well before WWII has even begun?
I am not disputing that Jews were persecuted. I am disputing that there is a premeditated, industrial murder of 6 million by gassing and that **the evidence is historically, logistically, and forensically questionable**.
I'm not asking you to surrender. I'm asking you to debate. Be prepared with your sources, and I'll be prepared with mine. If truth indeed is on your side—why fear the debate?
I realize that this is a contentious topic, and I anticipate opposition—but request you to remain open-minded and to read this.
We have learned for decades now that 6 million Jews were systematically killed by the Nazis by means of almost exclusively gas chambers in death camps like Auschwitz and Treblinka. Not just is this account accepted but mandated by law in many countries, dissent being the equivalent of hate.
But I have ended up raising serious questions about a lot of details in this account.
Not out of disrespect—because history needs to be open for questioning. And when some part of history is off-limits to discussion, that's when we need to question it the most.
Ask yourself:
- Where is Hitler's explicit, clear command?
- Why are there so many of the supposed gas chambers post-World War II rebuilds?
- Why are no Red Cross accounts of the time written that include the term "genocide"?
- Why are some "survivor" accounts inconsistent, or subsequently proved to be untrue?
- Why is the number "6 million" being published in newspapers well before WWII has even begun?
I am not disputing that Jews were persecuted. I am disputing that there is a premeditated, industrial murder of 6 million by gassing and that **the evidence is historically, logistically, and forensically questionable**.
I'm not asking you to surrender. I'm asking you to debate. Be prepared with your sources, and I'll be prepared with mine. If truth indeed is on your side—why fear the debate?