Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Israel: How biased against Israel do you perceive the Media to be?
#1
It can be difficult to obtain unbiased-information on Israel from the typically-pro-“Palestinian” Arab media, in particular the European Media. This makes it difficult for people to assess if what they are getting is based in anti-Semitism.
Anti-Semitic-falsehoods are typically: UNSUBSTANTIATED-allegations against Israel that insult the reader’s intelligence by being provided with:
No detail, no objective-sources; zero evidence. The following is an example of recent pro-“Palestinian” Arab bias:
 
Stuart Norval presenter on France 24 English, backdates the name “Palestinian people” from 1964, to when under the British Mandate, BOTH Jews and Arabs were “Palestinian”:
- - - - Start of extract from English Audio: - - - -
 
[Stuart Norval’s introduction to the France 24 English program “Kibbutz Revisited” - Scroll to 1 minute, 10 seconds in:]
 
Issued on: 18/09/2020.

Quote:"[...] the Kibbutzim built in strategic locations to defend the land for Jewish settlers as conflicts grew with the Palestinian people [...]"
 
Extract source:
https://www.france24.com/en/middle-east/...he-kibbutz
 
- - - - End of extract from English Audio - - - -
 
The words “Palestinian people” used by France 24 about the “Arabs” of the British Mandate have been backdated in the program (from the 1960’s) back to the time of the British Mandate (1922 to 1948) for pro-“Palestinian” Arab propaganda, and thus constitute revisionist-History.


This is clear because the JEWS of British Mandate Palestine were Palestinian (see below).
 
The Kibbutzim were built prior to, and during the British Mandate, during which the “Arabs” as they were then known, attacked Jewish villages, including the co-operative villages called Kibbutzim.
 
The so-called “Jewish settlers” were Jewish returnee-exiles; the Jewish people have Judean heritage. The Jews are both an ethnicity and a religion.
By comparison, the “Palestinian” Arabs of the British Mandate (1922 to 1948) (now “Palestinians, the” aka “Palestinian people” (1964)), originate from Arab immigration into the British Mandate.
 
JEWISH citizens of British Mandate Palestine were Palestinian:
Extracts from five British “Government of Palestine” passports,
from which it can be seen that JEWISH citizens of the Mandate were “Palestinian”:
https://www.mediafire.com/file/p6hjhurn7...s.pdf/file
 
Citizenship under the British Mandate was “Palestinian” irrespective of ethnicity:
- - - - Start of extract: - - - -
 
Quote:“During the Mandatory Palestine period, the term "Palestinian" was used to refer to all people residing there, regardless of religion or ethnicity, and those granted citizenship by the British Mandatory authorities were granted "Palestinian citizenship”.
 
Extract source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinians
 
- - - - End of extract - - - -
 
- - - - Start of extract: - - - -

Quote:“When a user enters the word phrases “Palestinian people” and “Palestinian state” into the Ngram search bar, he discovers that they began appearing only in 1960.”
 
Extract source:
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11401...ian-people
 
- - - - End of extract - - - -

 
Article 5 of the “Amended Palestinian National Charter” (1968) - English defines today’s “Palestinians” as Arab.
 
The Arabs / “Palestinian Arabs”, since dropped the name “Arab” because they do not want you to understand they mostly originate from Foreign-Arab-Migrant-Workers who came to the land of Israel just prior to, and during the British Mandate, to take advantage of higher wages through Jewish returnee-exiles:
i)
http://theettingerreport.com/arab-migrat...n-society/
ii)
“Arab Immigration to Historic Palestine: A Survey”, by Richard Mather:
https://richardmatherblog.wordpress.com/2015/05/
iii)
https://www.meforum.org/6275/were-the-ar...-palestine
 
The “Palestinian” Arabs did not start calling themselves “Palestinians” / “Palestinian people, the”, until the 1960’s because till then they considered themselves Arab. In 1964 they decided on the new description because it fitted with their intention to steal the land of Israel from its indigenous Jews:
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11401...ian-people
 
Why did the “Palestinian” Arabs decide to falsely-claim they are native to the land of Israel?
The purpose of League of Nations (later the United Nations) Mandates such as the one awarded to Great Britain, was to develop the territory for the benefit of its native people:
- - - - Start of extract: - - - -

Quote:“Two governing principles formed the core of the Mandate System, being non-annexation of the territory and its administration as a “sacred trust of civilisation” to develop the territory for the benefit of its native people.”
 
Extract source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Nations_mandate
 
- - - - End of extract - - - -
 
 
Other examples of Media bias against Israel (France 24):
 
Early November 2021:
On the news that Israel approves 1,300 homes for the “West Bank”:
Stuart Norval presenter on France 24 English, promises that we will now bring you two views - one an Israeli and the other a Palestinian:
The Israeli who was interviewed, was from an anti-“settlement” organisation!
 
 
“France 24 English”, Jul 8, 2017: Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi visits Israel:
Words same or similar to the following, but the last part of the sentence was dropped upon this news item being repeated.
 
Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi visited Israel today, a country that most leaders would tend to avoid. ...
 
 
“France 24 English”, November 1, 2017:
Reported a Banksy pro-"Palestinian" Arab propaganda-“celebration” / alleged art installation, on the West Bank, mocking the anniversary of the Balfour Declaration 1917 and alleged British association with the re-establishment of Israel in 1948. The English version has since been deleted from the France 24 English website:
http://www.france24.com/en/20171101-bank...
I since found a French version at:
http://www.france24.com/fr/20171101-bank...-elizabeth
The piece is associated on the latter web page with Rania Zabaneh:
Quote: 

Quote:“Rania Zabaneh is a producer in Al Jazeera's Ramallah bureau”

https://www.aljazeera.com/profile/rania-zabaneh.html
 
 
“France 24 English”, November 1, 2017:
“France 24 English” alleged-documentary called: “Jerusalem Revisited”:
After a brief introduction falsely-referring to [Israeli] “colonisation”, it gave its time as follows:
the opinion of a [Christian] businessman;
then giving most of the available time to an African-Palestinian (who complained about the eye and skin colour of Jewish Israelis);
and finally the program was able to find a Jewish Israeli to put Israel’s point of view - a lady who roams the streets of Jerusalem by night, feeding stray cats (see at 9 minutes, 23 seconds into the video):
http://www.france24.com/en/20171027-vide...s-tensions
 
 
“France 24 English” 2017: When reporting on the “Wonder Woman” movie, an image was shown of attractive star Gal Gadot with her arms outstretched, displayed for about 3 or 4 seconds during which a commentator remarked with words same or similar to:
“It seems she must have shaved her arm-pits.”
That was followed immediately by a much longer report about pretty Jordanian women training to go mountain climbing.
 
 
“France 24 English” November 2, 2017:
Report on the centenary of the British Balfour Declaration of 1917:
Misleading map displayed for about 3 seconds labeled “1917” and area labeled “Palestine”, whereas in 1917 that region was the Ottoman Turkish province of “Syria”, the British had not yet been awarded any Mandate, and the Ottomans never used any such political label of “Palestine”.


Continued in additional post on this thread ...
Reply
#2
Further examples of France 24 Media bias against Israel:

“France 24 English”, on or about April 2, 2018:
Iris Mackler reporting for French Government-owned “France 24 English”, in one of her reports regarding the Palestinian violence at the Gaza border with Israel, said words same or similar to:

Quote:“Israel is a mess.”

Since her comment clearly did not reflect the reality, perhaps it reflected biased wishful thinking?


“France 24 English”, April 28, 2018:
Iris Mackler reporting for French Government-owned “France 24 English”, in one of her reports regarding the Palestinian violence at the Gaza border with Israel, said that Palestinians who managed to break through the Gaza security fence simply ran back into Gaza:
One can only assume from her report that from:
> the Palestinian burning of tyres for a smoke-screen,
> their wire cutters,
> presence of identified Hamas military operatives,
> (all while Israel taking reasonable security measures against them to protect its citizens against Palestinians breaking though the fence to commit terrorism in Israel),
the “Palestinian” Arabs seek to convince the world that all of that is to allow some “innocent” Palestinians a little “free time” on the Israeli side of the fence, to “run about” a bit before returning to Gaza to have their tea.

France 24 English, July 3, 2018:
French Government-owned “France 24 English”:
Programme “Focus” - “Palestinian Minors face Israeli Military Justice”: Featuring Palestinian terrorist radicalization for Palestinian children, described by France 24 as a “workshop”. France 24 chose to report only the part where Palestinian children receive instruction how to cope with detention should they become arrested when attacking Israeli soldiers. But the children ‘have to obey the rules’ - their cell phones not being allowed: according to one of the children - English subtitle: 

Quote:“Because the Jews are listening to us!”.

One may reasonably consider what the children are instructed during the stated 5 hours of so-called “workshop” “advice” that France 24 chose to ignore due to its political-bias - Possibly, how to attack Israeli security?:
http://www.france24.com/en/20180703-focu...ison-deten

Alternative link:
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z6hjX-n0VN...ance24.com


Well, just fancy that! France 24 video showing a map of the middle-east where apparently Jordan covers an unlabeled Israel (screen-capture also attached) - see 22 seconds in. This is the map that so far they display in full screen mode when discussing middle east topics with the country being discussed colored white. (When discussing Israel specifically, they use a different map which does label the country): 
https://www.france24.com/en/tv-shows/rep...ts-in-iraq


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
Reply
#3
I would preceive that Media reports on Israel vs PLO et all have a slant to make the reader sympotheize with the PLO; HMAS: Hezbollah; Iraq; Iran; etc,etc,Etc
Reply
#4
For those who read English, these links tend to assist those looking for the truth rather than the Palestinian propaganda that flood the internet daily in order to not find it.

https://rotter.net/enews/news.php

https://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/World+News/M...ast/Israel
Reply
#5
(11-04-2021, 11:56 AM)Nooone Wrote: I would perceive that Media reports on Israel vs PLO et all have a slant to make the reader sympathize with the PLO; HMAS: Hezbollah; Iraq; Iran;  etc,etc,Etc

MSM just states Palestinians. It rarely separates the Palestinian people from Palestinian leaderships.  One would have to read the article (or look for multiple articles) to find out which group is actually dealing with. To keep it simple, the Gaza Strip is lead by Hamas and  WB Palestinians is lead by Fatah (the Palestinian Authority is one person with a bunch of yes men).
Reply
#6
When the media has nothing left to report on, the only way that they can stay in business is to distort events into newsworthy propaganda.
Reply
#7
(11-04-2021, 04:02 PM)Alan_Boskov Wrote: When the media has nothing left to report on, the only way that they can stay in business is to distort events into newsworthy propaganda.

That could tend to rather dismiss the clear anti-Israel / pro-"Palestinian" Arab bias in the Media as merely the Media seeking to concoct business for itself. 
Example of the Media clear-bias from my first post (providing examples of France 24 bias, for this discussion-thread): 

Quote:Other examples of Media bias against Israel (France 24):
Early November 2021:
On the news that Israel approves 1,300 homes for the “West Bank”:
Stuart Norval presenter on France 24 English, promises that we will now bring you two views - one an Israeli and the other a Palestinian:
The Israeli who was interviewed, was from an anti-“settlement” organisation!
Reply
#8
When most of the media is not reporting on the following, could this qualify as deliberate news coverage deriliction?:

https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/07/05/the...-israelis/

' Wrote:..."The question is not why we left, but why it took us so long to do so." And recent opinion polls find that almost half of Israeli youth would prefer to live somewhere else...

[Image: 9847780221.jpg?quality=90]
Reply
#9
I remember a so called "Balenced" PBS News program of Israelis and PLO..a Shoah Jew Survivor who lived on a kibbuty...He was asked his opinion about Israeli measures of the so called Intafata,,,,,,
Reply
#10
(11-03-2021, 10:29 PM)Robert Wrote: Further examples of France 24 Media bias against Israel:...
Here, some possible good news from France 24. Unlike half-Jew Sarkozy who turned out to be a menace for resident Jews, there seems to be a glimmer of hope with this new 100%er presidential candidate arrival:

Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)