Book Study-Prager's Rational Bible

[Chavak]

Okay, I'll start!

I am impressed the way he broke out different questions such as why and who. I did notice though when he said who it was for he had several categories - Jewish readers, Christian readers and non-religious leaders. Am wondering why he left out Muslim readers? Maybe he thought they wouldn't read his book?

I like that he says that he doesn't want the reader to accept anything on faith alone. And that he goes on to say that if something doesn't make rational sense, then he hasn't done his job. Then adding "On those few-thankfully, very few-occasions I do not have a rational explanation for a Torah verse, I say so."

He isn't saying take everything at his word, just that he offers a rational explanation based on his many years of study and understanding of the Hebrew language. And that he learned from people from all faiths.

One other thing I noticed is that when he thanks those who have helped him along the way, he doesn't mention G-d. Many religious writers thank G-d for all they have been given in life. He seemed to leave that out!

I have read the first 20 pages of the intro, I'll finish the rest this afternoon. I think he left out Muslims because they have their own scriptures, they do not believe the Torah is the uncorrupted word of G-d. So I would think that the book would be primarily of interest to Christians and Jews.

One thing I notice is he puts a heavy emphasis on "wisdom". Yet he does not define what it is. He also states it is impossible to do good without wisdom (top of page 19). So what is wisdom, and does one need it to do good?

One definition is that it comes from having experience, knowledge and good judgment. So this would indicate wisdom can only come from experience; it cannot be innate. However Proverbs 2:6 states :  "For the Lord gives wisdom; from His mouth [come] knowledge and discernment." meaning it is innate and not learned.

Another definition is ability to discern or judge what is true, right, or lasting. But what is true or right isn't necessary lasting....things change over time.

So I'm confused what he means by wisdom, and how he thinks we obtain it. I wish he would have defined it.