02-21-2024, 02:08 AM
Thank you for the welcome.
I listened to the video, but Tovia's statements are not linked to the text. In fact he says that this sin can be intentional, contradicts what the text says and what Rashi comments. He also says that the guilt offering is different from a sin offering. In fact, the text speaks of the guilt offering including a sin offering, then a burnt offering.
I did not say that someone bears the guilt of another (That is common Christianity doctrine), but that the NT actually says that Jesus became sin himself. The sins became his sins and the guilt became his guilt. I said that is not the normal way. Leviticus gives the normal way, the original meaning. In leviticus 5, no one bore the sins of others. But Isaiah 536 says that God said on him our iniquity. This cannot be the normal original meaning.
I listened to the video, but Tovia's statements are not linked to the text. In fact he says that this sin can be intentional, contradicts what the text says and what Rashi comments. He also says that the guilt offering is different from a sin offering. In fact, the text speaks of the guilt offering including a sin offering, then a burnt offering.
I did not say that someone bears the guilt of another (That is common Christianity doctrine), but that the NT actually says that Jesus became sin himself. The sins became his sins and the guilt became his guilt. I said that is not the normal way. Leviticus gives the normal way, the original meaning. In leviticus 5, no one bore the sins of others. But Isaiah 536 says that God said on him our iniquity. This cannot be the normal original meaning.