Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 5,448
» Latest member: JorgeMes
» Forum threads: 1,211
» Forum posts: 7,914

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 257 online users.
» 1 Member(s) | 252 Guest(s)
Applebot, Baidu, Bing, Google, searchinmyroots

Latest Threads
chatGPT for interpreting ...
Forum: Judaism General
Last Post: searchinmyroots
12-24-2025, 02:04 PM
» Replies: 9
» Views: 452
From when did the Anti-Se...
Forum: Israel
Last Post: RoBoR
12-23-2025, 06:06 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 121
Fascism and Democracy: Tw...
Forum: Israel
Last Post: RoBoR
12-23-2025, 08:34 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 94
Confrontation between the...
Forum: World Religion
Last Post: RoBoR
12-21-2025, 07:31 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 136
God Evolved
Forum: World Religion
Last Post: RoBoR
12-21-2025, 09:39 AM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 2,576
The Relationship Between ...
Forum: World Religion
Last Post: RoBoR
12-21-2025, 06:58 AM
» Replies: 59
» Views: 76,969
Dilema with "evil art"; t...
Forum: World Religion
Last Post: RoBoR
12-21-2025, 06:08 AM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 354
Prayers for Australia
Forum: Judaism General
Last Post: RabbiO
12-14-2025, 05:23 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 122
Has EU Commission "Humani...
Forum: Israel
Last Post: Robert
12-11-2025, 06:46 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 122
Daniel 10:21 word by word...
Forum: World Religion
Last Post: benJosef_and_benDavid
12-08-2025, 08:22 PM
» Replies: 21
» Views: 8,344

 
  Jewish soldiers served both World Wars in different countries!
Posted by: Nooone - 11-17-2021, 04:23 PM - Forum: Israel - Replies (1)

Alfred Eisenstaedt - Wikipedia

Saw a photograph of him in a US NAvy Uniform WWII

Richard Stern  
Awarded Iron Cross (WWI) & Silver Star (WWII) - Axis History Forum

Print this item

  How the Arabs who replaced Jews in 1948 became "poor" Arabs of Sheikh Jarrah in 2021
Posted by: Robert - 11-17-2021, 10:17 AM - Forum: Israel - No Replies

The following webpage refers to: “Eight Palestinian refugee families residing in Sheikh Jarrah [who] are facing forced eviction”:
https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/05/1091492
 
When the United Nations or the International Media refer to this issue, they will not mention that in 1948 the Jordanians illegally-occupied East Jerusalem and the “West Bank”. The Jordanians then expelled the Jews from East Jerusalem and then the U.N. / Jordanians settled Arabs (now known as “Palestinian Arabs” / “Palestinians”) on that land. Some Jewish landowners have since gone to court to apply to retrieve their land.
 
Consider: Is this issue about the Jews expelling poor Arabs, or is it in reality about Jews trying to retrieve their land after having been expelled from it by the Arabs! The Jews expelled from East Jerusalem (the “Old City”) by the Jordanians in 1948:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamizati...occupation
 
 
The Sheikh Jarrah issue:
 
In 2010 the Israeli Supreme Court reached a decision on a claim made by Jewish land owners. In Sheikh Jarrah, Jewish landowners owned the Freehold (Freehold = “permanent and absolute tenure of land or property with freedom to dispose of it at will”). The Jordanian authorities had granted leases (Lease = “a contract by which one party conveys land, property, services, etc. to another for a specified time”) to Arabs on that land. The time of those leases having expired, the Jewish landowners applied for the return of their property. The court found in the applicants favor.
 
The legal case has been to decide if the previous judgment should be enforced.
 
Clearly there would be no perceived issues, had the landowners been Arab rather than Jewish. The false-accusations of Jews trying to “expel poor Arabs so “settlers” can move in”, is wrong. Since the Arabs arrived in the land of Israel well after the Jews, and expelled the Jews from East Jerusalem, consider who really should be called “settlers”.
 
“Understanding the Sheikh Jarrah property dispute”, by Professor Avi Bell, lecturer at the University of San Diego School of Law and at Bar-Ilan University’s Faculty of Law - see under the heading “The legal basis of the parties’ property rights”:
https://www.jns.org/opinion/understandin...y-dispute/
 

Quote:“The four Sheikh Jarrah homes under discussion were built on land owned by Jews before the 1948 Israeli War of Independence, when they were seized by Jordan and leased to Palestinian families. After Israel captured the area in the 1967 Six Day War, a 1970 Israeli law transferred all abandoned properties still held by the Jordanian government, including the Sheikh Jarrah homes, to the custody of the Israeli government.
 
The law further obligated the release of properties to the original owners when possible. The Jewish trusts that owned the site appealed for its return to their hands, sparking decades of legal battles with Palestinian residents who vowed to stay put. [...]
 
In early October [2021], the Supreme Court published a compromise proposal: The Palestinians would be allowed to remain as protected tenants and Nahalat Shimon would be provisionally recognized as the owner of the land on which the homes were built. [...]
 
The Palestinians, who see the homes as rightfully theirs, have refused to recognize Nahalat Shimon’s ownership of the homes. [...]
 
Palestinians in the East Jerusalem neighborhood of Sheikh Jarrah on Tuesday rejected a compromise proposed by Israel’s Supreme Court that could have seen them stave off the threat of eviction for over a decade.
 
[...] around 200 [“Palestinian” Arab] families in East Jerusalem [... have] cases slowly moving through administrative bodies and Israeli courts [...]”

Extract source:
“Sheikh Jarrah Palestinians reject Supreme Court deal to stave off evictions”, by Aaron Boxerman, November 2, 2021:
https://www.timesofisrael.com/sheikh-jar...evictions/
 

 
Note on unfortunate general-appeasement of “Palestinian” Arab propaganda-terms:
 
The Jewish housing organization “Nahalat Shimon” is described by the pro-Arab United Nations and by the international media, as a: “settler” organization.
However, as can be clearly understood from the circumstances, it was Jewish-owned land that was seized by Jordan in the 1948 war, and it was Arabs (now referred to as “Palestinian Arabs” aka “Palestinians”) who were settled on that land by the U.N. / Jordan. Thus it is the Sheikh Jarrah “Palestinian” Arabs who are the settlers; not the Jewish owners of the land in question, nor “Nahalat Shimon” - the Jewish housing organization.
 
Regarding the recent compromise proposal by the Israeli Supreme Court. The Jurists who sit on that esteemed court may be assumed to be fearless-lawyers who decide according to law (legislation, legal precedent, legal documentation, etc). However, would it really be legally-appropriate / conscionable, when making their legal decision / proposing compromises, for them to take into account the threat of another 4,000 or more “Palestinian” Arab rockets, such as those fired at Israel allegedly in support of the Sheikh Jarrah “Palestinian” Arabs in May 2021?:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Israe...ine_crisis
And:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Pa...el_in_2021

Print this item

  Saw this Interesting...
Posted by: Nooone - 11-16-2021, 09:33 PM - Forum: Israel - No Replies

The angels of Eretz Yisrael - Israel National News

Print this item

  Warning the UNRWA is no Friend to Israel
Posted by: Nooone - 11-16-2021, 09:22 PM - Forum: Israel - Replies (2)

Researcher: UNRWA is run by terrorists - Israel National News

Print this item

  Why the Arab/Jewish dispute over the Land of Israel has been such a “big issue”
Posted by: Robert - 11-16-2021, 08:17 PM - Forum: Israel - No Replies

People are influenced by the Media.
The international media reports the news, as is its job.
There have been many U.N. anti-Israel resolutions: 
For example, between 2012 and 2015, there were “97 resolutions criticizing countries; 
83 out of those 97 have been against Israel (86%)” - see: 
U.N. Anti-Semitic, Anti-Israel bias - “The U.N. and Israel: Key Statistics from UN Watch”: 
https://www.unwatch.org/un-israel-key-statistics/

Anti-Israel U.N. resolutions provide a ready-made (anti-Israel) news item.
The reason for so many anti-Israel U.N. resolutions is that of the 57 Arab and Islamic aligned countries who are members of the “Organization of Islamic Cooperation”, the 56 that are also U.N. members follow the “Organization of Islamic Cooperation’s” policies on the Arab / Israel dispute when they vote in the U.N. 

If the “Palestinian” Arabs had refrained in accordance with the Oslo Accords, from claiming as they do, ALL the land of Israel, then they would also not have persisted in their propaganda campaign in the United Nations, as reported through the international Media.
In those circumstances, logically the dispute would not have remained such a “big issue” in the Media.
As can be seen above, many U.N. anti-Israel resolutions over a period of time as reported in the Media.
People are influenced by such anti-Israel negative-Media coverage.

The reason for such a high level of attention then, has been that following the “Oslo Accords”, the “Palestinian” Arabs continued with:
Claiming ALL the land of Israel,
seeking to replace Israel with their own state,
and to expel the Jews;
while at the same time seeking to deceive the world they seek a two-state solution, which they do not as is clear from the Palestinian education system (below) and their National Charter (below),
running a consistent campaign through the United Nations as reported by the International Media.

Just to be clear - the “Palestinians” are Arab: 
- - - - Start of extract: - - - -

Quote:“The Palestinians are those Arab nationals [...]”

Extract source: 
Amended Palestinian National Charter (1968) - English, Article 5: 
http://ecf.org.il/media_items/677

- - - - End of extract - - - -

In breach of the “Oslo Accords”, the “Palestinian” Arabs: 
Claim ALL the land of Israel, as is clear from the Palestinian education system: 
“PA education: A recipe for hate and terror”, Jul 21, 2015: 
https://www.palwatch.org/page/8399
and from the “Palestinian National Charter” (source given above).

Since the “Palestinian” Arabs could not achieve their objectives (see above) by force, and having already gained autonomy of about 40% of the "West Bank", and the whole of Gaza, the “Palestinian” Arabs commenced a highly successful propaganda campaign against Israel, utilizing the United Nations.

The “Palestinian” Arabs have been able to abuse the United Nations in that manner because they start-off in U.N. votes by enjoying a block-vote in their favor of up to 56 Arab and additional Islamic-aligned countries (e.g. U.N. member states that are also members of the “Organization of Islamic Cooperation” and follow its policies when voting in the U.N.) (as mentioned above) , and also the influence of Arab oil money with its consequential trading power; all that compared to Israel being just one country.

The U.N and “European Union” (which copies U.N. polices against Israel) are both fully-complicit with “Palestinian” Arab propaganda, by refusing to recognize the land of Israel as the ancestral-homeland of the Jewish people. Both the U.N and E.U. thus falsely-treat (see Hasmonean Kingdom - anon) the Jewish people as “invaders”, and so also as “thieves” and “illegal-occupiers” of the Jews OWN homeland (all the areas of land being of the prior Jewish kingdoms of Judah / Israel (below)), likewise illogically of building “illegal-settlements” there, with Palestinian terrorism considered “resistance to occupation”.

In United Nations General Assembly votes on the Arab / Israel dispute, a requirement for a Two-Thirds Majority is often invoked, to prevent a U.N. vote passing in favor of Israel. Example: 
https://news.un.org/en/story/2018/12/1027881

Why is the U.N. Security Council whose resolutions are considered binding, biased against Israel? The mentioned U.N. block-vote bias against Israel gives the “Palestinian” Arabs more influence both in the General Assembly and in the Security Council, compared to Israel being just one country. U.N. Security Council resolutions against Israel are typically passed during the tenure of U.S. Democratic Party Presidents who decide not to use their veto to protect Israel; e.g. U.N. Security Council resolution 2334.


Media bias and anti-Semitism within the Media is also a factor in support of the above-mentioned objectives of the “Palestinian” Arabs, with such support utilizing revisionist history, as in the following Media example: 

Stuart Norval presenter on France 24 English backdates the name “Palestinian people” from 1964, to when under the British Mandate, BOTH Jews and Arabs were “Palestinian”: 
- - - - Start of extract from English Audio: - - - -

Quote:“[...] the Kibbutzim built in strategic locations to defend the land for Jewish settlers as conflicts grew with the Palestinian people [...]”

Extract source: 
Stuart Norval’s introduction to the France 24 English program “Kibbutz Revisited” - Scroll to 1 minute, 10 seconds in. 
Issued on: 18/09/2020: 
https://www.france24.com/en/middle-east/...he-kibbutz

- - - - End of extract from English Audio - - - -

The words “Palestinian people” used by France 24 about the “Arabs” of the British Mandate have been backdated in the program (from the 1960’s) to the time of the British Mandate (1922 to 1948) for the purpose of pro-“Palestinian” Arab propaganda, and being historically-incorrect, the piece thus constitutes revisionist-history.

JEWISH citizens of British Mandate Palestine were Palestinian: Extracts from five British “Government of Palestine” passports, 
from which it can be seen that JEWISH citizens of the Mandate were “Palestinian”. PDF pages: 
Page 1 for an Arab name, 
page 2 for a Jewish name, 
page 3 for a Jewish name, 
page 4 for a Jewish name, 
page 5 for a Jewish name. 
Page 6 Sources. 
https://www.mediafire.com/file/p6hjhurn7...s.pdf/file
The Media of the time referred to the British Mandate inhabitants, as: 
“Palestinian Arabs”, / “Palestinian Jews”, or as: “Arabs” / “Jews”. 

Citizenship under the British Mandate was “Palestinian” irrespective of ethnicity: 
- - - - Start of extract: - - - -

Quote:“During the Mandatory Palestine period, the term “Palestinian” was used to refer to all people residing there, regardless of religion or ethnicity, and those granted citizenship by the British Mandatory authorities were granted “Palestinian citizenship”.

Extract source: 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinians

- - - - End of extract - - - -

- - - -Start of extract: - - - -

Quote:“When a user enters the word phrases “Palestinian people” and “Palestinian state” into the Ngram search bar, he discovers that they began appearing only in 1960.” 

Extract source: 
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11401...ian-people

- - - - End of extract - - - -

The “Palestinian” Arabs were opposed to being called a “People” until the 1960’s: 
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11401...ian-people

Using “Palestine” to negate the name Israel for the land is misleading, as there has never been any indigenous sovereign state of “Palestine”. The only valid name for the land belongs to the Jewish indigenous sovereign states before the Re-establishment of Israel in 1948: “Israel” or “Judah”.

The Jewish people are the indigenous people of their ancestral-homeland of Israel with unbroken presence there since Biblical times: 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographi...e_(region)

Israel is Re-established within the Jewish ancestral-homeland. Internationally-recognized history shows that the last indigenous sovereign state in the land of Israel (Roman-imposed name “Palestine”), prior to the re-establishment of Israel in 1948, was the post-Biblical Jewish Hasmonean Kingdom. It included the "West Bank", Gaza, and Golan Heights. Capital (what is now East) Jerusalem / “Old City”; between 110 BCE / 754 BH and 63 BCE / 706 BH - Map: 
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c...ingdom.jpg

Print this item

  When should the premise of anti-Israel questions be challenged, instead of answered?
Posted by: Robert - 11-16-2021, 03:50 PM - Forum: Israel - No Replies

When should the premise of an anti-Israel question be challenged, instead of answered?

The following is an example of such a question posted to a different website:
 
“Why doesn’t the US condition aid to Israel to force it negotiate over the Israeli-Palestine Conflict?”
 
Were we to answer that politically-biased anti-Israel question “to the point”, this causes us, as designed by that question, to imply we accept all the following:
 
i) That Israel has not negotiated.
ii) That Israel is unwilling to negotiate.
iii) That no party other than Israel should take any negotiating initiative.
 
What is the question really asking?:
“Why doesn’t the US use its Security Aid to Israel as Leverage, to force Israel to give in to Palestinian demands?”
 
The question wording should therefore be challenged, rather than answered ‘to the point’:
 
 
The questioner appears to have worded their question so that their opinion biased against Israel, would be validated.
 
Can it be appropriate to seek to force Israel to negotiate, when Israel concluded an international treaty (below) with the “Palestinian” Arabs.?
 
“Arabs”:
Amended Palestinian National Charter (1968) - English, Article 5: Quote:

Quote:“The Palestinians are those Arab nationals [...]”

Extract source: 
http://ecf.org.il/media_items/677

 
The treaty to which I refer is the “Oslo Accords” -
“Oslo II Agreement” link, at:
http://www.acpr.org.il/English/documents-e.htm
 
Under the “Oslo Accords” the “Palestinian” Arabs have autonomy (not sovereignty), for areas known as the “Palestinian Territories”.
 
In breach of the “Oslo Accords”, the “Palestinian” Arabs:
Claim all the land of Israel as is clear from the Palestinian education system:
“PA education: A recipe for hate and terror”, Jul 21, 2015:
https://www.palwatch.org/page/8399
and from the “Palestinian National Charter” (source above).
 
Following the Oslo Accords the “Palestinian” Arabs have also fired numerous rockets at Israeli cities:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Pa...el_in_2021
and pay a reward-pension under the “Palestinian Authority Martyrs Fund” to the families of those who have been imprisoned by Israel for attacking Israeli civilians including children:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinia...rtyrs_Fund
 
Two examples from the “Palestinian” Arab on-going violence where attacks are directed against Israeli Jewish civilians including children, and where “Palestinian” Arab propaganda typically refers to any consequential security measures as “Israeli-oppression”: 
Quote:'23 August 2019 ... Israeli girl ... Rina Shnerb [age 17 was killed; she] had been hiking with her brother Dvir and her father Eitan near a natural spring outside Dolev when an improvised explosive device blew up.'

Extract source:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-49447035
 
 
Israeli Jewish child Hallel Yaffa Ariel murdered for her ethnicity by a Palestinian terrorist: “Israeli girl, 13, fatally stabbed in her bedroom in West Bank” [by a Palestinian terrorist, June 30, 2016], The Guardian:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/j...iryat-arba
 
The question also refers to United States Security Aid to Israel, yet while ignoring that there is an ongoing “Palestinian” Arab war of ethnic hatred directed against Israeli Jews:
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/com...-in-israel
 
While also ignoring that the “Palestinian” Arabs continue to be significantly funded by the “European Union” under the guise of “humanitarian aid” (see below) - Heading: “How are we helping”:
https://ec.europa.eu/echo/where/middle-e...lestine_en
 
The question also ignores United States funding of the “Palestinian” Arabs.
 
 
“guise of “humanitarian aid” ”:
 
Where “humanitarian aid” is awarded to the “Palestinian” Arabs on the basis of their “refugee” status, it should be noted that the “Palestinian” Arabs were awarded by the United Nations, a unique refugee status, automatically-gained by it passing through their generations. They obtained this unique refugee status because the “Palestinian” Arabs enjoy a block-vote in their favor in the U.N. of what is now up to 56 Arab and additional Islamic-aligned countries, who are also members of the “Organization of Islamic Cooperation” and follow its policies when voting in the U.N:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organisati...ooperation
 
“Palestinian refugee camps” gain their status as “refugee camps” by the presence within them of those “Palestinian” Arabs who have automatic refugee status attained by it passing through their generations:
https://www.unrwa.org/palestine-refugees
 
 
Aid awarded to the “Palestinian” Arabs lacks substantiation at to their alleged “humanitarian” need, particularly when compared with other groups considered to have genuine humanitarian need:
https://hum-insight.info/
 
 
A further concern about putting pressure on Israel to make yet further concessions, would be that all the areas upon which the “Palestinian” Arabs have their Oslo Accords control, are of the ancestral-homeland of the Jewish people. Modern Israel is re-established within the Jewish ancestral-homeland. Internationally-recognised history shows that the last indigenous sovereign state in the land of Israel (Roman-imposed name “Palestine”), prior to the RE-establishment of Israel in 1948, was the post-Biblical Jewish Hasmonean Kingdom. It included the "West Bank", Gaza, and Golan Heights. Capital (what is now East) Jerusalem / “Old City”; between 110 BCE / 754 BH and 63 BCE / 706 BH - Map:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c...ingdom.jpg
 
Judaism is an ethnicity as well as a religion:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_is_a_Jew%3F
 
The Jewish people are indigenous to their ancestral-homeland of Israel, with unbroken presence there from Biblical times:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographi...e_(region)
 
 
People rarely question the validity of the claims made by the “Palestinian” Arabs on the land of Israel, even though the Arabs arrived in the land well after the Jews (sources anon). The name “Palestine” was used by the Romans to attempt to negate Israel / Judah as names for the land. Today the “Palestinian” Arabs, use the name “Palestine” for the same purpose. There has never been an indigenous “Palestine” / Arab sovereign state in the land of Israel upon which the “Palestinian” Arabs could base any claim to any part of Israel.
 

Quote:“After crushing the [Jewish] Bar Kokhba revolt [135 CE / 779 BH–778 BH], the Roman Emperor Hadrian applied [imposed] the name Syria Palestina to the entire region, that had formerly included Judea province.”

Extract source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syria_Palaestina
 

 
Quote:'[...] The word Palestine derives from Philistia, the name given by Greek writers to the land of the Philistines, who in the 12th century BCE occupied a small pocket of land on the southern coast, between what are now Tel Aviv–Yafo and Gaza. The name was revived by the Romans in the 2nd century CE in “Syria Palaestina,” designating the southern portion of the province of Syria [which included Roman-occupied Israel ...]
it had no official status until after World War I and the end of rule by the Ottoman Empire, when it was adopted for one of the regions mandated to Great Britain. [...]'


Extract source:
https://www.britannica.com/place/Palestine
 
 
The “Palestinian Arabs” dropped the name “Arab” so it should not be understood they mostly originate from foreign Arab migrant workers who came to the land of Israel just prior to, and during the British Mandate, to take advantage of higher wages through Jewish returnee-exiles.
Four sources:
 
“Arab Migration Shaped Palestinian Society” - The Ettinger Report.com:
https://theettingerreport.com/arab-migra...n-society/
 
“Arab Immigration to Historic Palestine: A Survey”, by Richard Mather:
https://richardmatherblog.wordpress.com/2015/05/
 
Were the Arabs Indigenous to Mandatory Palestine” - MeForum.org:
https://www.meforum.org/6275/were-the-ar...-palestine
 
The Smoking Gun: Arab Immigration into Palestine, 1922-1931” by Fred M. Gotthei:
https://www.meforum.org/522/the-smoking-...-palestine
 
The “Palestinian” Arabs considered themselves Arab and so were opposed to being called a “People” until the 1960’s:
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11401...ian-people
 
The following is research that I extracted from data of “forebears.io”, showing the most numerous “Palestinian” Arab surnames are more prevalent outside the Palestine region:
84 of 100 of the highest incidence Palestinian surnames (Palestine region in 2004), had highest incidence outside that region: See my “Country Origin of Palestinian Arab Surnames upd.pdf” - Information source “forebears.io”:
https://www.mediafire.com/file/9d115bv6w4z4kzb/Country+Origin+of+Palestinian+Arab+Surnames+upd.pdf/file
 
 
Conclusion:
(See above for sources.)
 
The Arabs (“Palestinian” Arabs) have no objective historical evidence for their claims on any part of the land of Israel. Israel therefore did not need to make concessions, yet has done so for peace, by way of the Oslo Accords. The “Palestinian” Arabs breached the Oslo Accords by claiming all the land, firing rockets at Israeli cities, and by paying reward for terrorism. The “Palestinian” Arabs are funded not only by the “European Union” but also by the United States. Israel has already made all the concessions that could reasonably be expected from any country.
Seeking to put pressure on Israel to make yet more concessions, while failing to put pressure on the “Palestinian” Arabs to make concessions, constitutes political bias.
 
- - - - End of challenge to question - - - -

The above is based on an answer I attempted to post to, but was deleted by, Stack Exchange (here with additional explanation added to the beginning, minor corrections, and some updated URLs), at: 
https://politics.stackexchange.com/questions/63454/why-doesnt-the-us-condition-aid-to-israel-to-force-it-negotiate-over-the-israel/63553 - 63553
 
Though not included here, the answer had included a claim under Stack Exchange’s rule that allows what they term, a: “frame challenge”; a challenge to the basis [premise] of the question asked.

Their excuses for deleting my answer were:
It did not answer the question (thus simply ignoring my “frame challenge”),
and that it was: “biased” (yet I believe it is clear who was really biased in this case).
 
 
Extract from exchange of comments from Stack Exchange:

Robert:
[Stack Exchange moderator] Contributor “JJJ” wrote: “I don’t think your answer addresses the question. The question asks about US aid to Israel.”:
My answer contained the following at the beginning: “Others may therefore consider my answer includes a “frame challenge””. The question was not about U.S. aid to Israel, it was about using U.S. aid to Israel for leverage.

Print this item

  Why Easu and Ishmael fight the L-D
Posted by: Nooone - 11-16-2021, 01:37 AM - Forum: Judaism General - Replies (1)

Of desecrated Torahs and Jewish destiny - Israel National News

Print this item

  read this in regard to farming in Eretz Israel
Posted by: Nooone - 11-16-2021, 12:42 AM - Forum: Israel - No Replies

The story of the Heter Mechira - Israel National News

Print this item

  Turkish Army in Lybia....
Posted by: Nooone - 11-15-2021, 01:02 PM - Forum: Israel - Replies (1)

After 100 years Turkey occupied The Pearl of the Orient  {Northern Syria}
Now Turkish Army is in Lybia   [trying to snatch the Oil and propel Turkey into SUperpower{?}
Turkish military intervention in the Second Libyan Civil War - Wikipedia

One good result is that no Jewish Person going to under the "Jurisdiction" of Either Lybians  or the Turkish army
Because Lybia is JUDENFREI

Print this item

  Hey there, New here!
Posted by: Ronin82 - 11-15-2021, 03:12 AM - Forum: Introductions - Replies (2)

My name is Reuben and I'm here to connect with my family more. I'm ethnically Jewish on my father's side, but pursuing conversion so I can be a full member of the community. I've always felt close to my Jewish family and am looking forward to learning more about our history and traditions.

I was raised in a Christian cult, but my parents always told us kids about our heritage. They didn't encourage us to explore it, but we did know we were ethnically Jewish. When I went to college I pursued every class on Judaism offered. I also spent over a year living with an Orthodox family while I learned Martial Arts from them. That has been the best period of my life so far, as well as the most difficult, but it helped me see that I wish to be formally converted to Judaism to truly connect with the part of my family I've been cut off from for so long. I LOVE my Jewish family, ALL of them! I'm currently undergoing the conversion process and hope to be official by early next year. 

I have an interest in the mystical as well as philosophical pursuits in religion. Pesach is my favorite festival, and hearing the Shehechiyanu still brings me to tears. My specialties in study are Biblical interpretation, resistance movements in Jewish history, and general history. I'm looking forward to some spirited discussions and learning lots from those who know more than I do.

Not married, no kids, young-ish and disabled, but looking to connect with my family. Thanks for letting me lurk here for a while!

Print this item