Biden Needs a Plan B for Yemen If Houthis Win | The Washington Institute

Yemen is going to fall to an Iranian Backed Jew hating Amercian hating fundalimist Muslin Group

Saudi Arabia the last living relic created by British EMpire. will fall as  well...

Jews in Yemen; UAE, Bahrain EGYPT...get out while you can ..or You will end up living under the NEW Hamans of IRAn..as the Jews there live....just like your Europen brethern "lived"  under the European Haman A....  H,,,,,, 
Dont think you can suvive this AMALEK...because..their agenda is for NO JEWS TO SURVICE>>>> Judnefrei and Cleansed OF JEWS>.....

If you choose not to leave..then begin writting Yizkor Books.....

CHOOSE LIFE OR DEATH...IT IS YOUR CHOICE>>>> 

In Scripture many verses (sentences) seem to start with the letter vov, rather more than would perhaps seem necessary, so that in the English translation one is reading "And ..." rather often. In fact when I read Scripture I now often ignore the "And" which for me then makes the passage run more smoothly and actually makes it clearer. Have you tried this?

I have noticed that the word "And" is not the only word used in translation for the letter Vov at commencement of a sentence; for example a substitution for "And" quite often used is "Now ...; others are "So", "But". 
Stone Tanach, Exodus: "And" 1:1, "So" 1:11, "But" 1:12, "Then" 4:11, "So" 4:18 and 4:20.

In Leviticus 20:7-27 the Stone Tanach English translation ignores the Vav at commencement of each verse as it does in many places such as Numbers 17:12 to 27 and other too numerous to mention such as 1 Chronicles 12:24 to 37!

Is it possible the Vov at commencement of a verse / sentence is mostly not meant to be translated, but rather represents some form of punctuation, or some form of sentence break?

Hello All - 

I need your opinion on something.

My son's Bar Mitzvah is April 2022.

My wife & I are disagreeing about the luncheon afterwards.

We are NOT having a dinner party at night.

My wife is saying a Kiddush Luncheon after the service is fine.

I found a place where it is outdoors. However, because of time, they only have what they are calling a "Picnic Option".

Choices of 4 sandwiches, Tea, salad, etc.  She is fine with the "Picnic option".  

However, I am thinking, if you have people coming in from all over the country, it should be a little more than sandwiches and the Kiddush Luncheon.  
We are doing an "out of town" dinner"  

Just not sure which is more appropriate. 

Thoughts?

Thanks.
Dave

EU to send millions to PA organization in Jerusalem - Israel National News

Latest article:
Iran-backed Houthis seize US Embassy in Yemen, Hold staff hostage (israel365news.com)

HOUTHAI HAVE VOWED TO CLEAR YEMEN OF ITS LAST JEWS
The last 7-6 Jews will be forced to flee ,,if they want to live a jewish woman kidnapped and forced to marry a muslin; a jewish woman and her brother; three jewish men....and a Jewish man imprisioned for saving a Torah Scroll....
https://www.aish.com/jw/s/The-Last-Jews-of-Yemen.html

I think the time of the latest British created state  Saudi Arabia....is going to fall....

Meanwhile latest News on the US equipped  Taliban....
[WATCH] Taliban holds parade featuring US military equipment (israel365news.com)

I thought this video was very interesting, hope you do as well!

If I'm not mistaken, if you're not a member, you can watch a certain amount of videos per month, but I may be wrong.

https://www.alephbeta.org/playlist/josep...urce=email&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=11112021-vayeitze

What was the Balfour Declaration 1917?:

Quote:“The Balfour Declaration was a public statement issued by the British government during World War I announcing support for the establishment of a “national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine, then an Ottoman region [...]
The declaration was contained in a letter dated 2 November 1917 from the United Kingdom’s Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour to Lord Rothschild, a leader of the British Jewish community, for transmission to the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland”.

Extract source: 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration

Quote:Foreign Office
November 2nd, 1917
 
Dear Lord Rothschild,
I have much pleasure in conveying to you. on behalf of His Majesty’s Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet
His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.
I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
Yours,
Arthur James Balfour

Source:
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/tex...eclaration

Quote:“[...] On November 2nd, 1917, two days after the conquest [by British and allied forces from Ottoman Turkish forces] of Beersheba, the [British] Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour wrote what he called a declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations. This was to become a most crucial document in the history of Palestine [the Land of Israel].
 
The key sentence was:
‘His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people’.
 
News of the Balfour Declaration found the British forces advancing northward. By November 15th, [1917] Jaffa had fallen, and the troops turned eastward toward the Judean mountains. [...]”

Extract source:
Transcript of video-audio:
Israel Television 1986, “Pillar of Fire” documentary, Chapter One:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjBSmqgkbxE

[Note: If, as seems frequently so, this URL becomes invalid, please use the YouTube search field to find: “Pillar of Fire episode one”.]

Quote:Both the Balfour Declaration 1917 and the British Mandate document 1922, quote: 

“[...] it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine [...]”

Extract source:
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/palmanda.asp

Quote:“The Mandatories, as opposed to colonial authorities, administered the territories in accordance with the terms of the mandate and on behalf of the League of Nations. [...]”

Extract source:
Page 70, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, edited by Armin Von Bogdandy, Rüdiger Wolfrum, Christiane E. Philipp.

Saved to:
https://www.mediafire.com/file/hjjtefiac...w.pdf/file

“Palestine” is the Roman-imposed rename of Israel / Judah, used by the Romans for attempting to negate Israel as the name for the land, and today used likewise by the “Palestinian” Arabs and their primarily anti-Semitic supporters.
 
The name “Palestine” applied only to foreign rule of the land of Israel, first by the Romans who imposed that name to negate Israel / Judah as names for the land, and later for the Mandate awarded to Great Britain between 1922 and 1948. The Romans had resurrected the name “Palestine” (Philistine) from the region much smaller than Israel, in which (by Roman times the defunct) Philistines had been. Both of those usages of the name were rule by a foreign imperial power. There has never been any indigenous “Palestine” / Arab sovereign state in the land of Israel.
 
Neither is the name “Palestine” any valid geographical name; a correct geographical name for the region is “Levant”.
 
From where did “Palestine” as a name imposed on the land of Israel, come?
The Romans imposed the name “Palæstina” (“Palestine”) on Roman-occupied Judah / Israel, resurrecting the name from the defunct much smaller region of: Hebrew: פלשת , “Pleshet”, Latin: “Palæstina”, Greek: “Philistia” (https://www.britannica.com/place/Palestine), within which had previously been the Philistine five city kingdoms.
[“Philistia” boundaries: From its south (approx. today’s Gaza) from Wadi El-Arish, to its North the Yarkon River (approx. today’s Jaffa), at its East the Kingdom of Judah, and to its West the Mediterranean Sea]:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c...30_map.svg
 
The Philistines had been destroyed by the Babylonians under Nebuchadnezzar in 603/4 BCE / 1263 BH–1262 BH.
See Page 13 of:
New Discoveries Among the Philistines: Archaeological and Textual Considerations
by Michael G. Hasel - Southern Adventist University:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0ahUKEwi0z4HymIjUAhVFrI8KHc06BdsQFgg_MAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.southern.edu%2Fadministration%2Farchaeology%2Fdoc%2Fscholarly_publications%2FDiscoveries.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGY8133rf_oqSlPwTADSwve-v5jzg
 
The “Palestinian” Arabs have no connection with the ancient Philistines.
 
It was following the disappearance of the Philistines, that the Roman occupiers of Israel/Judah resurrected the name “Palestine” (Filistine), to impose it on the much larger region of Jewish Israel/ Judah: 

Quote:“In the aftermath of the war [the Simon bar Kokhba revolt against the Roman Empire in 132 C.E. / 505 B.H. to 135 C.E. / 502 B.H., Roman Emperor] Hadrian consolidated the older political units of Judea, Galilee, and Samaria into the new province of Syria Palaestina (Palestine) [...] derived from the ancient sea-faring Philistine people who occupied the coastal plain around the first millennium B.C.E.” 

Extract source:
http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Bar_Kochba

Quote:'[...] The word Palestine derives from Philistia, the name given by Greek writers to the land of the Philistines, who in the 12th century BCE occupied a small pocket of land on the southern coast, between what are now Tel Aviv–Yafo and Gaza. The name was revived by the Romans in the 2nd century CE in “Syria Palaestina,” designating the southern portion of the province of Syria [which included Roman-occupied Israel ...]
it had no official status until after World War I and the end of rule by the Ottoman Empire, when it was adopted for one of the regions mandated to Great Britain. [...]'

Extract source:
https://www.britannica.com/place/Palestine

Quote:“[...] the southern sub-provinces of Ottoman Syria administrative region, includ[ed] by the end of 19th and early 20th century
the Mutasarrifate of Jerusalem,
the Nablus Sanjak
and Acre Sanjak (under Beirut Vilayet from 1888 and previously under Syria Vilayet) [...]”. 

[Note: I have added some carrier returns.]
 
Extract source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Syria 

Quote:“The Mandatories, as opposed to colonial authorities, administered the territories in accordance with the terms of the mandate and on behalf of the League of Nations. [...]”. 

Extract source:
Page 70, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, edited by Armin Von Bogdandy, Rüdiger Wolfrum, Christiane E. Philipp.
Saved to:
https://www.mediafire.com/file/hjjtefiac...w.pdf/file

What happened to anti-Semitism following the end of the Nazi genocide of Jews?: It became institutionalized within both (below) the “European Union” and the “United Nations” (U.N. built-in pro-Arab 56 country block-vote). 
The European Union is primarily a trading-block and there is more apparently to be allegedly-gained in supporting the “Palestinian” Arabs, rather than in annoying oil-producing Arab countries with their consequential trading power. 
The U.N. and the E.U. both deny the Jewish people’s roots in the Jews ancestral-homeland of Israel, and support the false, unverifiable-claims of the “Palestinian” Arabs. 

The “European Union” funds the “Palestinian” Arabs knowing the “Palestinian” Arabs conduct an on-going war of territorial ambitions, and ethnic-hatred against Israeli Jewish civilians including children. 
The E.U. has no valid auditing how its aid to the “Palestinian” Arabs is spent (see below). 

Some Aid paid to the “Palestinian Authority” aka Fatah, is paid by the P.A. to “Hamas” which runs Gaza, from which numerous Palestinian rockets are fired at Israeli cities whenever the fancy takes them. 

Why does the E.U. pay their aid to the “Palestinian” Arabs, fully-aware this: 
i) Constitutes either direct or indirect funding for “Palestinian” Arab terrorism (see below). 
ii) That funding terrorim represents an obstacle to peace? 
It is because the E.U. is institutionally anti-Semitic. A French / German top-heavy influenced-organization, where France is institutionally anti-Semitic, as can be seen by the anti-Israel / pro-“Palestinian” Arab propaganda produced by its State-owned “France 24” TV, for example early November 2021, on the news that Israel approves 1,300 homes for the “West Bank”, Stuart Norval presenter on France 24 English, promises that they will now bring the viewer two views - one an Israeli and the other a Palestinian: 
The Israeli who was interviewed, was from an anti-“settlement” organisation!

The “Palestinian” Arabs have no incentive to renounce hate and conflict, and to sincerely negotiate peace, because while the European Union pays “lip-service” to supporting a two-state solution and to respecting Israeli security, the E.U., it also provides the “Palestinian” Arabs with both political support and prodigious ready-cash. The E.U. is well aware their cash will be used to free-up funds for the “Palestinian” Arab war-machine. As the E.U. knows, the “Palestinian” Arabs in reality do NOT support a two-state solution, but instead seek ALL the land of Israel, as shown by what is taught by the Palestinian education system and “Palestinian National Charter”. Those funding the “Palestinian” Arabs knowingly and intentionally-fund the “Palestinian” Arab war of ethnic-hatred against Israel. 

The “Palestinian” Arabs are also often falsely-referred to as the “hapless Palestinians”, whereas in reality they are bankrolled by the “European Union” and the United States. “E.U.” funding to the “Palestinian” Arabs, is French and German government money, who launder it through the “European (Union) Commission” as: “humanitarian aid”.

The “European Union” bankrolls the “Palestinian” Arabs: 

Quote:“How are we helping? In 2021, the European Union provided €34 million [EXR. Nov 11, 2021, USD $38,924,900] in humanitarian funding for Palestinians in need, including funds to address emerging needs due to the coronavirus pandemic and the recent violence in Gaza. [...]”

Quote:“How are we helping? In 2020, the European Union is providing €23.7 million [EXR. Jan 31, 2021, USD $28,765,875] in humanitarian funding for Palestinians ... including funds to address [the ...] coronavirus.” 

Quote:‘The Palestinian Authority Martyrs Fund are two funds operated by the Palestinian Authority (PA). The Foundation for the Care of the Families of Martyrs pays monthly cash stipends to the families of Palestinians killed, injured, or imprisoned while carrying out violence against Israel.[1] The Prisoners Fund makes disbursements to Palestinians imprisoned in Israeli jails. In 2016, the PA paid out about NIS 1.1 billion (US$303 million) in stipends and other benefits.[2]

Critics often call the fund "pay for slay" and blame the payments for encouraging terrorism. [...]’

(Please see webpage for citations.)

Extract source: 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinia...rtyrs_Fund

Quote:"The new 2013 report of the Court [European Court of Auditors] reveals that $2.7 billion in direct aid [foreign aid given by the European Union] to the Palestinians between 2008 and 2012 could not be accounted for and appeared to be lost. In addition, EU investigators who visited Jerusalem and areas on the West Bank were unable to obtain information or speak to Palestinian officials about corruption in the areas they controlled.” 

Extract source: 
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/...ities.html

Would anyone be able to tell me where in the Talmud remaining silent over speaking out is not the best option?


The question arises from my listening to a psychologist being interviewed about the psychology of mass movements. There was some discussion about the Solomon Asch Experiment when the psychologist mentioned the Talmud stating that a piece of our soul is lost when we forfeit the opportunity to speak our truth but choose to refrain.

It seems there is more written about silencing the tongue and Lashon Hara then on speaking up when there is a need.  The question then could be how do you know?

Thanks for any help.