| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Forum Statistics |
» Members: 4,349
» Latest member: Tomo
» Forum threads: 1,149
» Forum posts: 7,633
Full Statistics
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 113 online users.
» 0 Member(s) | 110 Guest(s)
Applebot, Bing, Google
|
|
|
| Why do some people wrongly believe Modern Israel was "created" by the United Nations? |
|
Posted by: Robert - 10-28-2024, 08:40 AM - Forum: Israel
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Why do some people wrongly believe Modern Israel was "created" by the United Nations?
Israel was not Re-established by the United Nations.
Israel was not “created”; modern Israel is Re-established within the Jewish ancestral-homeland as can be seen by looking at a map of the Jewish Hasmonean kingdom; there has never been any indigenous “Palestine” / Arab sovereign state in the land of Israel.
The last indigenous sovereign state in the land prior to modern Israel, was the post-Biblical Jewish Hasmonean Kingdom (including the "West Bank" (land of the previous Jewish Kingdoms of Judah and Samaria), Gaza, and Golan Heights), with its capital of (what is now "East") Jerusalem; between 110 BCE / 754 BH and 63 BCE / 706 BH:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c...ingdom.jpg
People often allege that following the Second World War the Allies Re-established Israel:
The Allies did NOT Re-establish Israel.
People often allege land was "given" to the Jews to Re-establish Israel:
NO land was given to the Jews.
Israel was NOT Re-established due to the Holocaust, but because the land of Israel is the ancestral-homeland of the Jewish people.
In 1947 the United Nations proposed a Partition Plan (two-state solution) under resolution 181. While the Jewish Community accepted the Plan, it requires more than one party to constitute any agreement. The Palestinian Arab response was to start a civil war to take ALL the land and ethnically-cleanse or murder the Jews from the Jews ancestral-homeland of Israel.
Israel was Re-established in 1948 following the United Nations Partition Plan.
Why is the word "following" an accurate description?
> Because the U.N. in proposing the Partition Plan approved the Re-establishment of Israel; approved Jewish self-determination within the Jewish people's ancestral-homeland of Israel; and approval of an Arab state (for which there was and is, neither precedent nor justification) within the land of Israel).
> Because Israel's Re-establishment followed (in point of time) that U.N. Partition Plan.
The U.N. Partition Plan then, acted as a catalyst, causing the Palestinian Arabs to react as they typically do, with violence, by their violent-rejection of the U.N. Partition Plan, attacking the Jews, and leaving the Jewish Community with no choice but to defend themselves, resulting in defense capable of Re-establishing Israel.
|
|
|
| Ensure you know the difference on the Battlefield between a Journalist and a Spy! |
|
Posted by: Robert - 10-27-2024, 06:11 PM - Forum: Israel
- No Replies
|
|
Consider in the Israel -v- Terrorists war, what the difference on the battlefield is, between a: Journalist and a Spy:
Journalist: Spy:
Has a map of the area Ditto.
Has a camera Ditto.
Wants the best "pix" of the other side Ditto.
Wants best PIX of sensitive military areas Ditto.
Will nicely-expand those digital images Ditto.
Transmits PIX to public (thus to both sides) Transmits PIX to one side!
Wears a BIG sign saying: "Press" Ditto.
May say they are "Independent" Says they are "free lance"!
They are 'only doing their job' Likewise!
Information contained in images of an ongoing conflict amounts to surveillance intelligence, which will be used by the one side to inflict casualties upon their opponents.
The following is an example of legislation from the United States, their military apparently having expressed significant concern about Media-surveillance being publicly-released and consequently, placed in the hands of any enemy:
Quote:[Heading:] '18 U.S. Code § 797 - Publication and sale of photographs of defense installations'
'On and after thirty days from the date upon which the President defines any vital military or naval installation or equipment as being within the category contemplated under section 795 of this title, whoever reproduces, publishes, sells, or gives away any photograph, sketch, picture, drawing, map, or graphical representation of the vital military or naval installations or equipment so defined, without first obtaining permission of the commanding officer of the military or naval post, camp, or station concerned, or higher authority, unless such photograph, sketch, picture, drawing, map, or graphical representation has clearly indicated thereon that it has been censored by the proper military or naval authority, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.'
'(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 738; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)'
Source:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/797
Heading: "Israel accuses 6 Al Jazeera journalists in Gaza of being Palestinian militants":
https://apnews.com/article/al-jazeera-jo...8235e19e86
Heading: "IDF claims uncovered documents prove 6 Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ operatives":
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_e...peratives/
|
|
|
|
| Should Benjamin Netanyahu PM of Israel, resign over the Oct 7th 2023 Hamas attack? |
|
Posted by: Robert - 10-26-2024, 06:28 PM - Forum: Israel
- Replies (1)
|
|
Should Benjamin Netanyahu Prime Minister of Israel, be made to resign over the October 7th, 2023 Palestinian Arab Hamas barbaric attack and massacre?
No, not unless the reader would have thought it appropriate for Franklin D. Roosevelt (President of the United States from 1933 to 1945) to resign over the Japanese attack on Peal Harbor of December 7, 1941.
President Roosevelt's address to a joint session of the U.S. Congress on December 8 1941 is as appropriate a description today of Israel's circumstances following the Palestinian Arab Hamas attack, as it was for the United States' response to the Japanese attack on U.S. forces in Pearl Harbor in 1941.
Following President Roosevelt's accurate description of the attack on Pearl Harbor as:
'a date that will live in infamy',
the President went on to say:
Quote:'No matter how long it may take us to overcome this premeditated invasion, the American people in their righteous might will win through to absolute victory. I believe I interpret the will of the Congress and of the people when I assert that we will not only defend ourselves to the uttermost, but will make very certain that this form of treachery shall never endanger us again.'
Extract source:
https://www.history.com/topics/world-war...arl-harbor
|
|
|
|
|
