03-04-2022, 06:07 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-04-2022, 06:08 AM by Alan_Boskov.)
(03-03-2022, 10:41 PM)LAsttime Wrote: ...Would a bad example be if a Jewish person does cold cruel action on another Jewish person and refusing to show either remorse or repentence brings shame not only to himself but also to Jews everywhere to the notice of the L-D?...When a Jewish person transgresses against anothe Jewish person, the issue remains within the Jewish community itself, unless the transgression enters a serious legal realm of the country of which the transgression has taken place. in other words, if that transgressing Jewish person has been caught in bed with the wife of another Jewish person or has performed petty theft, this event is to be resolved between both parties, without needing to draw in the police. In extreme cases where murder is involved, that becomes an unavoidable legal matter.
Much more important is the question of transgressions of which are so open to public view that these actions could bring shame to an entire community or to an entire ethnicity. Transgressions at such a level involve transgressions by an individual of one certain group taken against a person or persons of a different group of which is the root of prejudice against an entire group, if similar transgressions tend to repeat themselves. Without needing to be specific, one only has to examine statistics relating certain crimes to the incarceration statistics of which apply to any certain group.
Of utmost importance, here in this forum, is to debate the amount of shame of which the Law of Return legislation applied by a secular state can endanger the reputation of an entire group, if abused for protecting criminals from extradition to the foreign countries to where those crimes were commited, unless, of course, that country of which the alleged transgression was to have taken place is known for arbitrary judicial practices and/or unusually extreme punishment.
If that certain secular state were to return to a religiously-based one, where would the line get drawn, concerning international transgression issues and their incurring extraditional practices
