03-28-2019, 10:29 AM
That's an odd connection to make. I think I can honestly say I've never heard anyone try to draw a comparison between the two.
Question on 'im' ending in Gen 6:16
|
03-28-2019, 10:29 AM
That's an odd connection to make. I think I can honestly say I've never heard anyone try to draw a comparison between the two.
03-28-2019, 01:17 PM
(03-28-2019, 10:29 AM)Jason Wrote: That's an odd connection to make. I think I can honestly say I've never heard anyone try to draw a comparison between the two. I know right? What's unique is the comparison of the dimensions. What's not as unique is the comparison of the ark to the temple, for example: "https://www.academia.edu/21809546/On_the...e_Covenant On the Ark of Noah and the Ark of the Covenant The Ark of Noah expresses the “three worlds” by the three “decks” ofthe Ark (Gen.6:16) and the division of “all living things” into “birds,” “animals” and“every kind of creature that creeps along the ground” (Gen.6:20). With the Ark of theCovenant, the “three worlds” are expressed horizontally by the three main divisions ofthe Temple (the Portico, the Great Chamber and the Sanctuary), and vertically by thethree “storeys” of the Temple (1Kgs.6:8) .... By extension to the Temple the “three worlds” are the Portico (ulam); the Great Chamber (hekal ); and the Sanctuary (debir ) (see 1Kgs.6; cf.Ezk.40 & 41). With the Ark of Noah the “three worlds” are static or simultaneous within the Ark. " See also: http://reformedanswers.org/answer.asp/file/46637 Best, Toby
03-28-2019, 01:56 PM
(03-22-2019, 05:03 AM)zoe_lithoi@yahoo.com Wrote:(03-20-2019, 06:25 AM)Jason Wrote: It's a courtesy to the readership to quote the verse in Hebrew when you're asking about it. In this case, and with your question in red, Genesis 6:16 is: It's interesting to compare the Hebrew conjugated words for the 'three stories' of the Solomonic Temple in I Kings 6 with those we already covered, ie. the Ezekiel temple (Ezek 42:6) מֵהַתַּחְתֹּונֹות וּמֵהַתִּֽיכֹנֹות and Noah's ark (Gen 6:16). תַּחְתִּיִּם שְׁנִיִּם וּשְׁלִשִׁים The complete verse is: I Kings 6:8 [1Ki 6:8 KJV] 8 The door for the middle chamber [was] in the right side of the house: and they went up with winding stairs into the middle [chamber], and out of the middle into the third. פֶּתַח הַצֵּלָע הַתִּיכֹנָה אֶל־כֶּתֶף הַבַּיִת הַיְמָנִית וּבְלוּלִּים יַֽעֲלוּ עַל־הַתִּיכֹנָה וּמִן־הַתִּֽיכֹנָה אֶל־הַשְּׁלִשִֽׁים׃ The 'middle' and the 'third' stories are: וּמִן־הַתִּֽיכֹנָה אֶל־הַשְּׁלִשִֽׁים The 'third' storey has the plural ending as in Gen 6:16; however, the 'middle' is: TIKNH What does the h-suffix mean? Well, I found one place that says it is the definitive, as in 'the one and only' middle floor or perhaps 'the very middlest of the middle floors'? "...the h-suffix after 'amwr (inhabitant(s) makes this substantive definite" http://bhebrew.biblicalhumanities.org/viewtopic.php?t=925&start=10 This 'singular' usage in I Kings 6 is in stark contrast to the plural usage in Gen 6 and Ezek 42. So it seems to me, that the middle story had 1 floor, but the third storey had several floors. We might also compare the famous door of Noah's ark with this I Kings 6 door in the middle chamber on the right side of the house. [Gen 6:16 KJV] 16 A window shalt thou make to the ark, and in a cubit shalt thou finish it above; and the ----door--- of the ark shalt thou set in the ----side---- thereof; [with] lower, second, and third [stories] shalt thou make it. Toby
03-29-2019, 06:19 AM
Why do your words get bigger from post to post?
03-29-2019, 06:39 AM
(03-28-2019, 01:56 PM)zoe_lithoi@yahoo.com Wrote: The 'middle' and the 'third' stories are: I'm sure you mean tichoná (that is, תִּיכֹנָה tîḵōnâ). (03-28-2019, 01:56 PM)zoe_lithoi@yahoo.com Wrote: What does the h-suffix mean? It is the standard ending for feminine singular adjectives. For example, גָּדוֹל gāḏôl means "big," and its feminine singular form is גְּדוֹלָה gĕḏôlâ. In this case, the adjective is תִּיכֹן tîḵōn, and its feminine singular form is תיכנה tîḵōnâ. There is nothing odd here. (03-28-2019, 01:56 PM)zoe_lithoi@yahoo.com Wrote: Well, I found one place that says it is the definitive, as in 'the one and only' middle floor or perhaps 'the very middlest of the middle floors'? The word "definite" does not mean "the one and only." It just means that it is preceded by the word "the." By contrast, indefinite is preceded by the word "a" or "an" in English. It's a grammatical tag. It doesn't mean that I'm talking about the one and only thing of a class. It means that I'm talking about one that I've already mentioned. (03-28-2019, 01:56 PM)zoe_lithoi@yahoo.com Wrote: "...the h-suffix after 'amwr (inhabitant(s) makes this substantive definite" Not in Hebrew. That's how it works in Aramaic. What you're linking to is a passage from Aramaic, not from Hebrew. I know because I was participating in that thread (as you can see here—that's me!). In Hebrew, the definite article comes BEFORE the word, not after it. So, יֶ֫לֶד yɛ́lɛḏ means "boy" or "a boy." The definite form is הַיֶּ֫לֶד hayyɛ́lɛḏ "the boy." Adding a heh suffix would get you "girl," not "the boy." The word for "girl" is יַלְדָּה yaldâ, and its definite form is הַיַּלְדָּה hayyaldâ. I really think that you're attempting to combine stories that were never intended to be combined. I don't see this line of thinking leading anywhere productive or real.
03-29-2019, 09:22 PM
(03-29-2019, 06:39 AM)Jason Wrote:(03-28-2019, 01:56 PM)zoe_lithoi@yahoo.com Wrote: The 'middle' and the 'third' stories are: ok..... the singular form of 'third storey' is referring to the feminine gender. Thanks for the correction. ...... Toby
03-31-2019, 05:46 PM
(03-29-2019, 06:39 AM)Jason Wrote: I know because I was participating in that thread (as you can see here—that's me!). Jason, what an interesting and insightful conversation among the scholars! In particular, for me, was reading the differing points of view between you and the Norwegian scholar over the expression כּל-הַגּוֺיִם הָאֵלֶּה סָבִיב, and the various reasoning on why סָבִיב should read, by him anyway, as ambiguous.
04-01-2019, 12:45 AM
(03-31-2019, 05:46 PM)Dana Wrote:(03-29-2019, 06:39 AM)Jason Wrote: I know because I was participating in that thread (as you can see here—that's me!). It's been so long since I was in that thread. I'd have to read over it again to see what the argument was. LOL |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|