07-03-2020, 05:58 PM
(06-30-2020, 09:25 PM)Ismq Wrote: How the judaism explain the phropecies about jesus?e.g isaiah 53: 3-12.
(07-02-2020, 10:27 PM)searchinmyroots Wrote: I just read your post again and I see you made some revisions.
So yes, the servant was rejected.
Yes, the servant would not open his mouth.
No, nothing about crucified with criminals, where does it say that?
No, nothing about being a sacrifice for sin, where does it say that?
You cannot take a line here and there and understand the content unless you read and understand the whole of what is written.
Since I answered your questions, maybe you can answer mine -
Did Jesus have many deaths?
Is Jesus in the plural?
Was Jesus wounded from the sin of others and by his knowledge we are justified?
Was Jesus guilty of sin?
All of this is clearly written in Isaiah 53. If just one of the answers is no, then it cannot apply to Jesus.
(07-03-2020, 05:41 PM)searchinmyroots Wrote:(07-03-2020, 04:39 PM)George Wrote: It is documented with the thoughts of Jewish Rabbis.
As I mentioned previously, unless you understand the whole of what was written in it's entirety, then just quoting some lines here and there have no meaning.
I'm not sure why Christians quote the rabbi's, unless of course it seems to be for their agenda.
Do you know some of those same rabbi's adamantly reject the thought that Jesus was the awaited Jewish messiah?
So quote the rabbi's when it looks like Jesus but dismiss them when they say he wasn't the messiah.
If all you wrote that was quoted makes it so clear that Isaiah 53 is speaking about Jesus, why didn't the rabbi's who wrote those quotes agree?
Isaiah 53 was speaking of the Messiah, not giving the Messiah a name.
Daniel 7:13 I saw in the visions of the night, and behold with the clouds of the heaven, one like a man was coming, and he came up to the Ancient of Days and was brought before Him.
Rashi's comment:
One like a man was coming: That is the King Messiah.